We might not be able to agree on religion and morals, but there is one thing we agree on: science and technology is critical to the future of our country. That includes our future national security. So why are the candidates debating religion every other week while ignoring science? They're pandering to the wrong base if they want to win the general election, that's for sure!
WASHINGTON—May 12, 2008— A new poll shows that 85% of U.S. adults agree that the presidential candidates should participate in a debate on how science can be used to tackle America’s major challenges. The poll found no difference between Democrats and Republicans on this question. A majority (84%) also agree that scientific innovations are improving our standard of living.
Among the most serious long-term issues facing the country, 76% rate health care the most serious, followed by alternative energy sources (69%), education (67%) and national security (61%). Issues also considered serious by a majority of U.S. adults include global economic competition (55%), poverty (53%) and climate change (53%).
Other findings highlight a desire for public policy to be based on scientific evidence:
- 67% say that public policies should be influenced more by scientific evidence than by elected officials’ personal beliefs.
- 83% of U.S. adults - 88% of Democrats and 80% of Republicans - say it is important that the candidates talk about how science and scientific research will affect their policy-making decisions if they are elected.
- Only 19% say it is acceptable for elected officials to hold back or alter scientific reports if they conflict with their own views.
Labels: debates, policy, President, science, technology
